⌂ Home ☷ Board

LTIS 4 Agreement Review — Safops 20251124 (re-issue 2026-05-13)

Source: attachments/ticket-MC-3288/Safops_LTIS_4_Agreement_20251124.docx Sender: Pieter Richards · Headline change: KPI 4 now uplifts to 150%; rest is "clarity".

TL;DR

Scheme structure (unchanged)

Item Value
Scheme Commencement 1 Jan 2026
Scheme Period FY2026, FY2027, FY2028
Bonus Amount Multiplier × CTC at 31 Dec 2028 (fixed at that date)
Annual EBIT Threshold R 370m per year (gating)
Pay 1 50% after 2028 audit signoff
Pay 2 50% on 31 Jan 2030

KPI vesting matrix

KPI Weight Trigger Cap
1.3.1 — 2026 EBIT 25% ≥6% EBIT/turnover AND ≥R370m 150% (prorated above target)
1.3.2 — 2027 EBIT 25% ≥6% EBIT/turnover AND ≥R370m 150%
1.3.3 — 2028 EBIT 25% ≥6% EBIT/turnover AND ≥R370m 150%
1.3.4 — Cumulative 25% Cumulative 3-yr EBIT ≥ R2.1bn (R370m gates don't apply here) 150% — NEW: prorates upward on excess

KPI 1.3.4 mechanics (clauses 1.3.4 + 1.4): - < R2.1bn cumulative → 0% on this slice (no prorating downward). - ≥ R2.1bn → full 25% Vests; excess prorates upward subject to 150% cap. - For 1.3.4 only, annual R370m gate is ignored — all three years count regardless of individual misses.

Key clarity items worth flagging

  1. EBIT definition (clause 020): Capital Structure Neutrality — post-1-Jan-2026 financing-driven interest income/expense is excluded. Protects participants from cap-structure changes (debt raises, refinancings) eroding EBIT.
  2. Baseline Accounting Policies (clause 023-024): Locks in pre-IFRS 16 aircraft lease treatment (full lease expense as opex, not depreciation + interest). Stops accounting policy shifts moving the goalposts.
  3. Bonus Amount fixed at 2028 CTC (clause 015): Annual increases between 31 Dec 2028 and payment dates do not uplift the bonus. Worth noting if CTC inflation expected.
  4. Self-funding clause: Bonus must be fully provided in accounts — payment can be postponed if liquidity test not met.

Risks / things to push back on (optional)

Recommendation

Sign-off candidate after one clarifying question to Pieter:

"Confirm the prorating formula for cumulative EBIT > R2.1bn in clause 1.3.4 — is it linear (e.g. R3.15bn cumulative = 150%) or does it inherit the per-year 4/6-style example from clause 1.4?"

Otherwise change is participant-favourable (uplift potential, tighter EBIT definition) and acceptable.