You're offline — showing cached data

MC-3365

MC architecture review 2026-05-13 — Luci-as-agent assessment
2026-06-13 06:14:42 SAST
Home Board MC-3365

MC architecture review 2026-05-13 — Luci-as-agent assessment

Independent architecture review of Mission Control / Luci-as-agent setup against the canonical runtime contract. Reviewers: 2 internal audits (Atlas systems architect + general...
State Done Next Action Closed Owner Council Runtime Closed Age 30d ago
MC-3365
Ticket is done; runtime is closed. · profile claude_opus_1m_high · cwd /home/lucienne/workspace/mission-control · uptime 29d 21h · last activity 28d 22h ago

Description

MC-3365
Independent architecture review of Mission Control / Luci-as-agent setup against the canonical runtime contract. Reviewers: 2 internal audits (Atlas systems architect + general-purpose code-gap audit) + 5-model council (Codex, Gemini, GLM, Kimi, Opus). Full report: ~/PKA/Elmar Inbox/luci-agent-review-2026-05-13/FINAL-ASSESSMENT.md Top finding: core runtime contract (ticket → runtime_sessions → tmux → harvested history) is solidly implemented end-to-end. Architecture is mature and honest about its single-operator constraint. 4 critical/high findings require action. This epic groups 9 child tickets — top 4 are critical/high path. The other 5 are tier-2 hardening. Deferred items captured in Vault note (not ticketed): per-phase runtime profile overrides, Agent Registry, luci-chat session-summary, 6-vs-7 phase doc fix, council→workflow_events 3-line patch, non-dev workflow template.

Activity

done
Luci is working...
Live
No activity yet
Help